Konflikti v prostorskem načrtovanju: kritični pregled teoretičnih pristopov k zmanjševanju konfliktnosti
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/GV94102Keywords:
prostorsko načrtovanje, deliberacija, konflikt, poststrukturalizem, družbeno ustvarjen prostor, //, spatial planning, deliberation, conflict, post-structuralism, social production of spaceAbstract
Članek obravnava, kako različne smeri teorije prostorskega načrtovanja obravnavajo konflikte in kakšne pristope za zmanjševanje konfliktnosti uporabljajo. Konflikte smo predstavili skozi tri koncepte: javni interes, družbena produkcija prostora in težko rešljivi problemi. Celostni racionalni pristop se izogiba konfliktom z zanašanjem na objektivnost strokovnega znanja, deliberativni pristop skuša reševati konflikte z deliberacijo med enakopravnimi akterji, poststrukturalistični pristop pa konflikte označuje kot osnovo za izražanje različnih strokovnih in vrednotnih argumentov. Kljub zavedanju, da je tudi stroka lahko vir konfliktov in pristranska, deliberacija v stroki v teoriji ni posebej izpostavljena. Za zmanjševanje konfliktnosti prostorskega načrtovanja so zato potrebni pristopi, ki temeljijo na znanosti in formaliziranih postopkih, kot tudi pristopi, ki temeljijo na deliberaciji med akterji. //
Conflicts in spatial planning: Critical evaluation of theoretical approaches to conflict management
The article examines how different strands of planning theory conceptualize and deal with spatial conflicts. Conflicts are first presented in terms of three concepts: public interest, social production of space, and wicked problems. The rational approach avoids conflicts by relying on unbiased scientific knowledge, the deliberative approach resolves conflicts through deliberation between equal actors, while the post-structuralist approach sees conflicts as necessary to reveal actors’ different interests and value judgments. Despite the awareness that scientific knowledge is not always impartial, deliberation in the scientific sphere continues to be overshadowed by approaches facilitating citizen involvement. Knowledge-based approaches and the formalization of planning processes are essential alongside deliberation to tame the conflictual nature of spatial planning.
References
Alexander, E. R. 2002: The public interest in planning: From legitimation to substantive plan evaluation. Planning Theory 1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147309520200100303
Allmendinger, P., Tewdwr-Jones, M. (ur.) 2002: Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory. London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203996195
Arnstein, S. 1969: A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Davidoff, P. 1965: Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366508978187
De Roo, G., Hillier, J. (ur.) 2012: Complexity and Planning: Systems, Assemblages and Simulations. New York.
Faludi, A. 1998: From planning theory mark 1 to planning theory mark 3. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/239980839802500717
Flyvbjerg, B. 1998: Rationality and power. Democracy in Practice. Chicago, London.
Flyvbvjerg, B., Richardson, T. 2002: Planning and foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory. Planning Futures. New Directions for Planning Theory. London, New York.
Forester, J. 1984: Bounded rationality and the politics of muddling through. Public Administration Review 44-1.
Forester, J. 1993. Critical theory, public policy, and planning practice. Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany.
Forester, J. 2009: Dealing with differences. Dramas of Mediating Public Disputes. New York.
Foucault, M. 1972: The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York.
Fox, N. J. 2014: Poststructuralism and postmodernism. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society. Chichester. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118410868.wbehibs109
Goluža, M. 2021: Učinkovitost participativnega načrtovanja pri reševanju konfliktov: primer prostorskega umeščanja tretje razvojne osi na Koroškem. Koroška: od preteklosti do perspektiv. Ljubljana. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/zborovanje.016
Goluža, M., Šubic Kovač, M., Kos, D., Bole, D. 2021: How the state legitimizes national development projects: The third development axis case study, Slovenia. Acta geographica Slovenica 61-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.9572
Gordon, R. 2009: Power and legitimacy: From Weber to contemporary theory. The SAGE Handbook of Power. Los Angeles. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021014.n14
Gutmann, A., Thompson, D. F. 2004: Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton.
Habermas, J. 1974: Theory and Practice. London.
Habermas, J. 1983: The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston.
Habermas, J. 1989: The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston
Healey, P. 1997: Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2
Hendriks, C. M. 2006: Integrated deliberation: Reconciling civil society’s dual role in deliberative democracy. Political Studies 54-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00612.x
Hillier, J. 2008: Plan(e) speaking: A multiplanar theory of spatial planning. Planning Theory 7-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207085664
Innes, J. E., Booher, D. E. 2010: Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147949
Kitchin, R. 2006: Positivistic geographies and spatial science. Approaches to Human Geography. London.
Kos, D. 1993: Racionalnost neformalnih prostorov. Ljubljana.
Kos, D. 2002: Načela komunikacijskega delovanja. Aarhuška konvencija v Sloveniji: strokovna priporočila za implementacijo Konvencije o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah. Ljubljana.
Kos, D. 2013: Analiza umeščanja ljubljanske džamije. Teorija in praksa 50, 3-4.
Laclau, E., Mouffe, C. 2001: Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London, New York.
Latour, B. 2011: Pandorino upanje. Ljubljana.
Lefebvre, H. 2013. Produkcija prostora. Ljubljana.
Massey, D. 2005: For Space. London.
Moore, A. 2017: Democracy and problem of expertise. Critical Elitism: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Problem of Expertise. Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108159906.003
Mouffe, C. 2016: Democratic politics and conflict: An agonistic approach. Politica Comun 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/pc.12322227.0009.011
Pløger, J. 2004: Strife. Urban planning and agonism. Planning Theory 37-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095204042318
Počkar, M., Andolšek, S., Popit, T., Barle Lakota, A. 2009: Uvod v sociologijo. Ljubljana.
Poljak Istenič, S. 2019: Participatory urbanism: Creative interventions for sustainable development. Acta geographica Slovenica 59-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.5142
Resolution No. 2 on The European Regional/Spatial Planning Charter (Torremolinos Charter/Torremolinska listina).
Medmrežje: https://rm.coe.int/6th-european-conference-of-ministersresponsible-for-regional-planning/168076dd93 (30. 9. 2022).
Rittel, H. W. J., Webber, M. M. 1973: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Rorty, R. 2000: Universality and truth. Rorty and His Critics. Oxford.
Rus, P., Nared, J., Bojnec, Š. 2018: Forms, areas, and spatial characteristics of intermunicipal cooperation in the Ljubljana urban region. Acta geographica Slovenica 58-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.4830
Sager, T. 1999: The rationality issue in land‐use planning. Journal of Management History 5-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13552529910249869
Schroer, M. 2018: Spatial theories/social construction of spaces. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies. Chichester. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0313
Scott, H. V. 2009: Representation, politics of. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00986-X
Snoj, M. 2015: Slovenski etimološki slovar. Ljubljana.
Šmid Hribar, M., Kozina, J., Bole, D., Urbanc, M. 2018: Javno dobro, skupni viri in skupno: Vpliv zgodovinske zapuščine na sodobno dojemanje v Sloveniji kot tranzicijski družbi. Urbani izziv 29-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-2018-29-01-004
Šmid Hribar, M., Razpotnik Visković, N., Bole, D. 2021: Models of stakeholder collaboration in food tourism experiences. Acta geographica Slovenica 61-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.8756
Zakon o ratifikaciji Konvencije o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah. Uradni list Republike Slovenije 17/2004. Ljubljana.
Zakon o urejanju prostora. Uradni list Republike Slovenije 199/2021. Ljubljana.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All moral rights are retained by the author for copyright work submitted for publication in Geografskivestnik. The author transfers all material rights to reproduction and distribution in Slovenia and in other countries to the publisher free of charge, without time limit, for all cases, for unlimited numbers of copies, and for all analog and digital media without exception. If the article is not in line with the instructions for publication, the author shall permit the publisher to adapt the article accordingly. The publisher shall ensure that, given sufficient funds for printing, all positively reviewed articles shall be published in Geografski vestnik, generally in the sequence in which they are received and in line with the balanced distribution of articles by section. Commissioned articles may be published at any time regardless of the date they are received.No authorship fee is paid for articles in Geografski vestnik. Authors are entitled to one free copy of the publication.
Za avtorsko delo, poslano za objavo v Geografski vestnik, vse moralne avtorske pravice pripadajo avtorju, materialne avtorske pravice reproduciranja in distribuiranja v Republiki Sloveniji in v drugih državah pa avtor brezplačno, enkrat za vselej, za vse primere, za neomejene naklade in za vse analogne in digitalne medije neizključno prenese na izdajateljico. Če avtorsko delo ni v skladu z navodili za objavo, avtor dovoljuje izdajateljici, da avtorsko delo po svoji presoji ustrezno prilagodi. Izdajateljica poskrbi, da se vsi prispevki s pozitivno recenzijo, če so zagotovljena sredstva za tisk, objavijo v Geografskem vestniku, praviloma v skladu z vrstnim redom prispetja prispevkov in v skladu z enakomerno razporeditvijo prispevkov po rubrikah. Naročeni prispevki se lahko objavijo ne gledena datum prispetja. Članki v reviji Geografski vestnik niso honorirani. Avtorju pripada 1 brezplačen izvod publikacije.
