Prostori intertekstualnosti/intertekstualnost prostora
Ključne besede:
textual world, space, intertextuality, transgression, boundary, cultural space, identityPovzetek
Literary discourse interpellates the reading subject to take positions in the imaginary. The subject’s positions as structured by the text’s spatial syntax can be undone by forces that produce transgressive spaces. Intertextuality transplants or evokes other literary and socio-cultural spaces. Because of the fundamental intertextuality of space, identities are in permanent hybridization.Literatura
Gaston BACHELARD (1974): La poétique de l’espace. Paris: PUF.
Max BLACK (1981): “Metaphor.” In: Models and Metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 25–47.
--- (1995): “More about Metaphor.” In: Metaphor and Thought. Second edition. Ed. by A. Orthony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 19–41.
Lawrence CROSSBERG (1999): “Globalization and the ’Economization’ of Cultural Studies.” In: The Contemporary Study of Culture. Ed. by Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr und Internationales Forschungszentrum Kulturwissenschafte. Vienna: Turia + Kant. 23–46.
Gilles DELEUZE – Felix GUATTAR1 (1980): Mille plateaux. Paris: Éditions de minuit.
Erika FISHER-LICHTE (1990): “The Shift of the Paradigm: From Time to Space? Introduction.” In: Proceedings of the XIIth Congress of the ICLA. Ed. by R. Bauer et al. Munich: Iudicium. 15–18.
Jacques FONTANILLE (2000): “Formes tensives et passionnelles du dialogue des sémiosphères.” In: Westphal, ed. 2000. 115–124.
David FRISBY (1999): “Culture, Memory and Metropolitan Modernity.” In: The Contemporary Study of Culture. Ed. by Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr und Internationales Forschungszentrum Kultunvissenschafte. Vienna: Turia + Kant. 101–115.
Gérard GENETTE (1966): “Proust palimpseste.” In: Figures. Paris: Seuil. 39–67.
Jean-Marie GRASSIN (2000): “Pour une science des espaces littéraires.” In: Westphal, ed. 2000. I–XIII.
Marko JUVAN (2000a): Intertekstualnost. Ljubljana: DZS.
--- (2000b): “Medbesedilnost – detronizacija ali retorizacija vpliva?” [“Intertextuality – Dethronement or Rhetorization of Influence?”]. In: Vezi besedila [Textual Ties]. Ljubljana: LUD Literatura. 89–109.
Elizabeth KEATING (2001): “Space.” In: Key Terms in Language and Culture. Ed. by Alessandro Duranti. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 231–234.
Srečko KOSOVEL (1974): Zbrano delo 2 [Collected Works 2]. Ed. by A. Ocvirk. Ljubljana: DZS.
George LAKOFF (1995): “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor”. In: Metaphor and Thought. Second edition. Ed. by A. Orthony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 202–251.
Yuri LOTMAN (1990): “The Semiosphere.” In: Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Trans. by A. Shukman. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 123–214.
Chantal MOUFFE (1999): “Hegemony, Power and the Political Dimension of Culture.” In: The Contemporary Study of Culture. Ed. by Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr und Internationales Forschungszentrum Kulturwissenschafte. Vienna: Turia + Kant. 47–52.
Reingard NETHERSOLE (1990): “From Temporality to Spatiality: Changing Concepts in Literary Criticism.” In: Proceedings of the XIIth Congress of the ICLA. Ed. by R. Bauer et al. Munich: Iudicium. 59–63.
Daniel-Henri PAGEAUX (2000): “De la géocritique à la géosymbolique. Regards sur un champ interdisciplinaire : littérature générale et comparée et géographie.” In: Westphal, ed. 2000. 125–160.
Marcel PROUST (1969): Du côté de chez Swann. Paris: Gallimard.
Kian TAJBAKHSH (2001): The Promise of the City: Space, Identity, and Politics in Contemporary Social Thought. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Wolfgang WELSCH (1999): “Transculturality: The Changing Form of Cultures Today.” In: The Contemporary Study of Culture. Ed. by Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr und Internationales Forschungszentrum Kulturwissenschafte. Vienna: Turia + Kant. 217–244.
Bertrand WESTPHAL, ed. (2000): La géocritique : Mode d’emploi. Limoges: PULIM.
---(2000a): “Pour une approche géocritique des textes, esquisse.” In: Westphal, ed. 2000. 9–39.
