Avtor odgovarja (in spregovori)
Ključne besede:
poetika, retorika, Aristotel, pisatelj, bralec, anagnorisis, katarzaPovzetek
Avtor je mrtev. Naj živi avtor, ki je hkrati bralec in čigar pisanje in branje, govorjenje in poslušanje ima mnogo vidikov. V svojem vsakdanjem življenju so pismeni ljudje govorci, bralci, poslušalci in avtorji. Kot protiutež Sokratovemu skepticizmu do pesnikov in tega, da stvari prej oponašajo kot pa dejansko poznajo, članek obravnava analizo učinka pesnikovega oblikovanja zgodbe in lika na občinstvo, ki jo je Aristotel predstavil v svoji Poetiki. Temu sledi kratka razprava o drugih vrstah besedil. Književna, filozofska in zgodovinska dela, pa tudi sveta besedila, psihološka in druga dela poznajo dramatični odnos med avtorjem in občinstvom. Članek se osredotoča predvsem na anagnorisis (prepoznanje), ki ga doživljata lik in občinstvo, a je katarza (očiščenje) prav tako pomembna. Uprizarjanje tragedije občinstvo očisti strahu in sočutja. Poleg Aristotela in poetike članek obravnava tudi sorodno področje retorike, ki jo je Aristotel označil kot umetnost prepričevanja. Po mnenju pisca članka pa gre pri retoriki tudi za odnos med govorcem oziroma pisateljem in občinstvom. Kot v poetiki je tudi v retoriki prisotna drama pomena, in sicer v napetosti med avtorjem in bralcem oziroma občinstvom. Avtor kot ustvarjalec je na manj očitne in neposredne načine povezan tudi z avtorjem kot osebo. Nekatere zapletene podrobnosti pravega in nepravega prepoznanja lahko najdemo v ključnih besedilih, kot so na primer Sveto pismo, Homerjeva Iliada in Platonova Država, pa tudi v poznejših delih različnih zvrsti Jeana de Léryja, Williama Shakespeara, Sigmunda Freuda in Julie Kristeve. Pravo in nepravo prepoznanje včasih težko razlikujemo, pomagata pa nam prebroditi zamotanost diskurza in podob ter umetnosti in življenja. Pisec članka zagovarja igro med slepoto in uvidom v domnevnem prostoru književnosti in gledališča ter pisanja in branja na splošno.Literatura
Anonymous. The Famovs Victories of Henry the Fifth. London: Thaomas Creede, 1598.
Aristotle. Aristotle’s Theory of Poetry and Fine Arts with a Critical Text and Translation of The Poetics. Trans. S. H. Butcher. Fourth edition. London: Macmillan, 1911.
– – –. Poetics. Trans. H. Hamilton Fyfe. London: Heinnemann, 1927.
– – –. Rhetoric. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts. 1924. New York: Dover, 2004.
Aristotle, and George Alexander Kennedy. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
Arnhart, Larry. Aristotle on Political Reasoning: A Commentary on the Rhetoric. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 1981.
Atwill, Janet. Rhetoric Reclaimed: Aristotle and the Liberal Arts Tradition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.
Barthes, Roland. S/Z. Paris, 1970; in translation New York, 1974 and London, 1975.
Brandes, Paul D. A History of Aristotle’s Rhetoric, with a Bibliography of Early Printings. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow, 1989.
Blake, William. Poetry and Prose. Ed. David V. Erdman. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1965.
Brannigan, John. New Historicism and Cultural Materialism. New York: St Martin’s, 1998.
Brecht, Bertolt. Brecht on Theatre. Trans. John Willett. New York, 1964.
Burguière, André. L’École des Annales: une histoire intellectuelle. Paris: O. Jacob, 2006.
Burns, T. “The Tragedy of Slavery: Aristotle’s Rhetoric and the History of the Concept of Natural Law.” History of Political Thought 24 (2003): 16–36.
Carlson, Marvin. Theories of the Theatre: A Historical and Critical Survey, from the Greeks to the Present. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1984.
Clayton, Edward W. “The Audience for Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” Rhetorica 22 (2004): 183–203.
Eliot, T. S. “Tradition and the Individual Talent.” The Sacred Wood. Essays on Poetry and Criticism. London: Methuen & Co, 1920.
Erickson, Keith V. “A Bibliography for the Study of Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 12 (1982): 55–61.
– – –. Aristotle: The Classical Heritage of Rhetoric. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow, 1974.
– – –. Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Five Centuries of Philological Research. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow, 1975.
Farrell, Thomas B. “Philosophy against Rhetoric in Aristotle.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (1995): 181–98.
Freud, Sigmund. “On Beginning the Treatment” (1913). The Freud Reader. Ed. Peter Gay. New York: W. W. Norton, 1989.
Frobish, T. S. “An Origin of a Theory: A Comparison of Ethos in the Homeric Iliad with That Found in Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Review 22 (2002): 16–30.
Furley, David J., and Alexander Nehamas. Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994.
Garver, Eugene. “Aristotle’s Rhetoric as a Work of Philosophy.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 19 (1986): 1–22.
Ginzburg, Carlo. The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller. Trans. John and Anne Tedeschi. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
– – –. History, Rhetoric, and Proof. The Menahem Stern Jerusalem Lectures. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1999.
Green, Lawrence D., ed. John Rainolds’s Oxford Lectures on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1986.
Gross, Alan G., and Arthur E. Walzer. Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2000.
Haskins, Ekaterina V. Logos and Power in Isocrates and Aristotle. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 2004.
Hegel, Georg W.F. “Philosophy of History.” History of Philosophy. Selected Readings. Eds. George L. Abernathy and T.A. Langford. Belmont, CA: Dickenson, 1969.
The Holy Bible. The Authorized or King James Version of 1611 Now Reprinted with the Apocrypha. With Reproductions of 105 of the Sixteenth-Century Woodcuts of Bernard Salomon. London, Nonesuch Press, 1963.
Homer, The Iliad. Trans. E.V. Rieu. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1950, rpt. 1977.
Hultzâen, Lee Sisson. Aristotle’s Rhetoric in England to 1600. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1932.
Hunt, Everett Lee. “Plato and Aristotle on Rhetoric and Rhetoricians.” Essays on the Rhetoric of the Western World. Eds. Edward P. J. Corbett, James L. Golden and Goodwin F. Berquist. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, 1990. 129–61.
Kantorowicz, Ernst. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957, rpt. 1997.
Kristeva, Julia. “The Novel as Polylogue.” Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Ed. L.S. Roudiez. Trans. T. Gora, A. Jardine, and L. S. Roudiez. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981.
Leff, Michael. “The Uses of Aristotle’s Rhetoric in Contemporary American Scholarship.” Argumentation 7 (1993): 313–27.
Léry, Jean de. History of a Voyage to the Land of Brazil. Trans. Janet Whatley. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.
Levin, Samuel R. “Aristotle’s Theory of Metaphor.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 15 (1982): 24–46.
London, A. J. “Amenable to Reason: Aristotle’s Rhetoric and the Moral Psychology of Practical Ethics.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (2000): 287–306.
McAdon, Brad. “Rhetoric Is the Counterpart to Dialectic.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 34 (2002): 113–50.
Menander. The Grouch. Trans. Lionel Casson. Greek Comedy. Ed. Robert W. Corrigan. New York: Dell, 1965, rpt. 1973.
Miller, Arthur. “Tragedy and the Common Man.” The New York Times, February 27 1949, 11, 1–3. Rpt. in Arthur Miller, Death of a Salesman (Text and Criticism: The Viking Critical Library). Ed. Gerald Weales. New York: Viking 1967, rpt. 1977, 147.
Moss, Jean Dietz. “Reclaiming Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” The Review of Metaphysics 50 (1997): 635–46.
Neel, Jasper P. Aristotle’s Voice: Rhetoric, Theory, and Writing in America. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1994.
Newman, Sara. J. “Aristotle’s Definition of Rhetoric in the Rhetoric: The Metaphors and Their Message.” Written Communication 18 (2001): 3–25.
Oates, Whitney J. Aristotle and the Problem of Value. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.
Payne, Paula H. “Tracing Aristotle’s Rhetoric in Sir Philip Sidney’s Poetry and Prose.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 20 (1990): 241–50.
Pirandello, Luigi. Six Characters in Search of an Author and Other Plays. Trans. Mark Musa. London: Penguin, 1995.
Plato. The Republic of Plato. Trans. Francis MacDonald Cornford. London: Oxford University Press, 1941, rpt. 1945.
Poulakos, John. Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1995.
Randall, John Herman, Jr. Aristotle. New York: Columbia University Press, 1960.
Roberts, W. Rhys. “Notes on Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” American Journal of Philology 45 (1924): 351–61.
– – –. “References to Plato in Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” Classical Philology 19 (1924): 342–46.
Rorty, Amâelie. Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.
Shakespeare, William. Henry V. Film. Directed by Laurence Olivier. Two Cities Films, 1944.
– – –. Henry V. Film. Directed by Kenneth Branagh. BBC/Renaissance Films, 1989.
– – –. The Riverside Shakespeare. Second Edition. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans with J. J. M. Tobin. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1997.
Sidney, Philip. Defence of Poetry. Ed. J. A. Van Dorsten. 1595. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1966.
Sophocles. Oedipus the King. Trans. David Grene. Greek Tragedies. Vol. 1. Eds. David Grene and Richmond Lattimore. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.
Speight, Allen. “’Listening to Reason’: The Role of Persuasion in Aristotle’s Account of Praise, Blame, and the Voluntary.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 38 (2005): 213–225.
Tessitore, Aristide. Reading Aristotle’s Ethics: Virtue, Rhetoric, and Political Philosophy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1996.
Wilde, Oscar, The Decay of Lying. New York: Sunflower Co., 1902.
Wildermuth, Mark E. “Hobbes, Aristotle, and the Materialist Rhetor.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 27.1 (1997): 69–80.
Wisse, Jakob. Ethos and Pathos: From Aristotle to Cicero. Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1989.
