Kartirajoči stroji: transformacije peterburškega teksta
Ključne besede:
literarna kartografija, Sankt Peterburg, kartiranje, ruska književnost, Dostojevski, Fjodor Mihajlovič, Zločin in kazen, Gogolj, Nikolaj Vasiljevič, Google ZemljevidiPovzetek
Referat obravnava metodologije in dosedanje ugotovitve geografskega vizualizacijskega projekta »Mapping St Petersburg«, katerega cilj je eksperimentalna kartografija »peterburškega teksta«, literarnega korpusa, katerega razvoj je prepleten z razvojem tako Peterburga kakor sodobne ruske kulture kot take. V nasprotovanju občutku samoumevnosti, pogosto značilnemu za literarno vedo, projekt poskuša peterburške tekste radikalno deformirati (v pomenu Jeroma McGanna). Pretvorba tekstov v prostorske podatke sproži proces potujitve (ostranenie), ki razkrije skrite pomene in razsežnosti. T. i. natančno branje prostora nam omogoča, da tekste kar tiramo in jih transformiramo v t. i. oddaljeno branje. Hkratni kognitivni proces branja prostorskih razmerij priskrbi kartografskemu eksperimentiranju kontekst. To preoblikuje literarne umetnine in ustvari nove vzorce pomena, ki razkrijejo potencialne tekste. Pri izdelovanju teh zemljevidov uporabljamo »neogeografska« orodja, kakršno je Google Zemljevidi. To tehnologijo odlikujejo preprostost uporabe, dostopnost, povezljivost s priljubljenimi mobilnimi tehnologijami in komunikabilnost. Ni ne ukazovalna ne distancirana, ampak omogoča, s čimer vabi k eksperimentiranju ter igri z minimalnimi stroški in porabo časa. Z njeno pomočjo ter na podlagi »bralnih strojev« in »algoritmične literarne vede« Stephena Ramsaya poskušamo tehnologijo uporabljati za generiranje miselnih iger. Za ponazoritev nekaterih rezultatov tega procesa bomo predstavili eksperimentalno kartiranje Zločina in kazni Dostojevskega in Gogoljevih peterburških povesti ter nakazali potencial tega projekta.Literatura
Antsiferov, N. P. Nepostizhimyi gorod… St Petersburg: Lenizdat, 1991.
Bruss, Elizabeth W. “The Game of Literature and Some Literary Games.” New Literary History 9.1 (1977): 153–72.
Caillois, Roger. Les jeux et les hommes. Paris: Gallimard, 1958.
Chernyshevsky, Nikolai. What Is to Be Done? Trans. Michael Katz. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.
Chizhevsky, Dmitri. “The Theme of the Double in Dostoevsky.” Dostoevsky: A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. René Wellek. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall, 1962. 112–29.
Dostoevskaia, A. G. Vospominaniia. Moscow: Pravda, 1987.
Dostoyevsky, Fyodor. Crime and Punishment. Trans. David McDuff. London: Penguin, 1991.
– – –. Notes from Underground. Trans. Michael Katz. New York: Norton, 2001.
Ehrmann, Jacques. “Homo Ludens Revisited.” Yale French Studies 41 (1968): 31–57.
Foust, Ronald E. “The Rules of the Game: A Para-Theory of Literary Theories.” South Central Review 3.4 (1986): 5–14.
Gogol, Nikolai. “Nevsky Prospect.” Gogol, The Collected Tales of Nikolai Gogol. Trans. Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. London: Granta, 2003. 245–78.
Grossman, Leonid. Dostoevsky: A Biography. Trans. Mary Mackler. London: Allen Lane, 1974.
Guldi, Jo. “What Is the Spatial Turn?” Spatial Humanities: A Project of the Institute for Enabling Geospatial Scholarship. Available at: http://spatial.scholarslab.org/spatial-turn (14 February 2013).
Hitchcock, Tim. “‘All Beside the Rail, Rang’d Beggars Lie.’ Trivia and the Public Poverty of Early Eighteenth-Century London.” Walking the Streets of Eighteenth-Century London: John Gay’s Trivia (1716). Ed. Clare Brant and Susan E. Whyman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 74–89.
Iakovlev, P. L. “Chuvstvitel’noe puteshestvie po Nevskomu prospekty.” Progulki po Nevskomu prospektu v pervoi polovine XIX veka. Ed. A. M. Konechnyi. St Petersburg: Giperion, 2002. 55–87.
Johnson, Jeri. “Literary Geography: Joyce, Woolf and the City.” The Blackwell City Reader. Eds. Gary Bridge and Sophie Watson. Malden (MA): Blackwell, 2002. 60–70.
Levin, John. “DH GIS Projects.” Anterotesis. Available at: http://anterotesis.com/wordpress/dh-gis-projects/ (26 February 2013).
Lindenmeyr, Adele. “Raskolnikov’s City and the Napoleonic Plan.” Slavic Review 35.1 (1976): 37–47.
Lotman, Iu. M. “Simvolika Peterburga i problemy semiotiki goroda.” Lotman, Izbrannye stat’i v trekh tomakh 2. Tallinn: Aleksandra, 1992. 9–21.
Lucian. “De Laude Cestrie.” Ed. Mark Faulkner. Mapping Medieval Chester Project. Available at: http://www.medievalchester.ac.uk/texts/introlucian.html (26 February 2013).
McGann, Jerome. Radiant Textuality: Literature After the World Wide Web. New York: Palgrave, 2001.
Moretti, Franco. Atlas of the European Novel, 1800–1900. London: Verso, 1998.
Piatti, Barbara et al. “Mapping Literature: Towards a Geography of Fiction.” Available at: http://www.literaturatlas.eu/en/2012/01/20/mapping-literature-towards-a-geography-of-fiction (14 February 2013).
Pope, Rob. Textual Interventions: Critical and Creative Strategies of Literary Studies. London: Routledge, 1995.
Ramsay, Stephen. Reading Machines: Towards an Algorithmic Criticism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2011.
Shklovskij, Viktor. “Art as Technique.” Literary Theory: An Anthology. Ed. Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan. Malden (MA): Blackwell, 1998. 17–23.
Stenton, Alison. “Spatial Stories: Movement in the City and Cultural Geography.” Walking the Streets of Eighteenth-Century London: John Gay’s Trivia (1716). Ed. Clare Brant and Susan E. Whyman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 62–73.
Tikhomirov, B. N. ”Lazar! Griadi von.” Roman F. M. Dostoevskogo Prestuplenie i nakazanie v sovremennom prochtenii: Kniga-kommentarii. St Petersburg: Serebriannyi vek, 2005.
Thacker, Andrew. “The Idea of a Critical Literary Geography.” New Formations 57 (2005): 56–73.
Toporov, V. N. Peterburgskii tekst russkoi literatury. St Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPb, 2003.
Turner, Andrew J. Introduction to Neogeography. Sebastopol (CA): O’Reilly, 2006.
Wood, Denis. The Power of Maps. New York and London: The Guildford Press, 1992.
Young, Sarah J. and John Levin. Mapping St Petersburg: Experiments in Literary Cartography. Available at: http://www.mappingpetersburg.org (20 March 2013).
