The Parody and Bakhtin
Keywords:
parody, dialogism, intertextuality, poststructuralism, new historicism, M. M. BakhtinAbstract
Bakhtin discussed the parody only in his morphological and stylistic or sociohistorical analyses of the novel. His theoretical outlines of its intertextual ethos were not adjusted to his notions of its historical functions. But within his conceptions of dialogism he elaborated a sophisticated, seminal model of the parody presented as a bivocal discourse. Anticipating the views of the new historicism, he reconciliated the structural-semantic, pragmatic, sociocultural and historical aspects of the parody (as a discourse, style. textual element or a genre). According to Bakhtin, the parody promotes ideological and stylistic pluralism in the sociolingual constellation of a culture, and undermines the power of predominant ideas by revealing their conditionality. On the other hand, its effects in the culture can be also conservative, unifying.References
BAHTIN, Mihail M. 1982: Teorija romana. Prev. D. Bajt, ur. A. Skaza. Ljubljana: Cankarjeva založba.
BAHTIN, Mihail M. 1975: Voprosy literatury i èstetiki: Issledovanija raznyh let. Moskva: Hudožestvennaja literatura.
BAHTIN, Mihail M. 1972: Problemy poètiki Dostoevskogo. Izdanie tret’e. Moskva: Hudožestvennaja literatura.
BAHTIN, Mihail M. 1984: Rabelais and His World. Prev. H. Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
BAHTIN, Mihail M. 1986: »The Problem of Speech Genres.« V: isti: Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Prev. V. W. McGee, ur. C. Emerson, M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press. 60–102.
BAHTIN, Mihail M. (Vološinov, V. N.) 1980: Marksizam i filozofija jezika. Prev. R. Matijašević. Beograd: Nolit.
BITI, Vladimir 1992: »Nietzsche, Bahtin i ’slaba misao’.« V: Bahtin i drugi. Ur. V. Biti. Zagreb: Naklada MD. 189–222.
CARROLL, David 1992: »Pripovjedni tekst, raznorodnost i pitanje političnosti: Bahtin i Lyotard.« Prev. M. Granik. V: Bahtin i drugi. Ur. V. Biti. Zagreb: Naklada MD. 157–188.
CROWLEY, Tony 1989: »Bakhtin and the History of the Language.« V: Bakhtin and Cultural Theory. Ur. K. Hirschkop, D. Shepherd. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 68–90.
DANE, Joseph A. 1988: Parody: Critical Concepts vs. Literary Practices, Aristophanes to Sterne. Norman, London: University of Oklahoma Press.
DANOW, David K. 1991: The Thought of Mikhail Bakhtin: From Word to Culture. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
EAGLETON, Terry 1992: »Wittgensteinovi prijatelji.« Prev. M. Pervan-Plavec. V: Bahtin i drugi. Ur. V. Biti. Zagreb: Naklada MD. 79–101.
FREJDENBERG, Ol’ga M. 1993: »Der Ursprung der Parodie.« V: Literaturtheorie und Literaturkritik in der Frühsowjetischen Diskussion. Ur. A. Hiersche, E. Kowalski. Berlin idr.: Aufbau Verlag. 391–402.
HANSEN-LOVE, Aage A. 1978: Der russiche Formalismus: Methodologische Rekonstruktion seiner Entwicklung aus dem Prinzip der Vetfremdung. Dunaj: Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
HANOOSH, Michelle 1989: »The Reflexive Function of Parody.« Comparative Literature 41/2. 113–127.
HEMPEL, Wido 1965: »Parodie, Travestie und Pastiche: Zur Geschichte von Wort und Sache.« Germanisch-romanische Monatsschrift 15. 150–176.
HEMPFER, Klaus 1973: Gattungstheorie: Information und Syntese. München: Fink.
HIRSCHKOP, Ken 1989: »Introduction: Bakhtin and Cultural Theory.« V: Bakhtin and Cultural Theory. Ur. K. Hirschkop, D. Shepherd. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 1–38.
HÖFELE, Andreas 1983: Parodie und literarischer Wandel: Studien zur Funktion einer Schreibweise in der englischen Literatur des ausgehenden 19. Jhdts. Heidelberg: C. Winter-Universitätsverlag.
HOLQUIST, Michael 1985: »The Carnival of Discourse: Bakhtin and Simultaneity.« Canadian Review of Comparative Literature 12/2. 220–234.
HUTCHEON, Linda 1984: »Authorized Transgression: The Paradox of Parody.« V: Le singe à la porte : Vers une théorie de la parodie. Ur. Groupar. New York, Bern, Frankfurt ob Majni: P. Lang. 13–26.
HUTCHEON, Linda 1985: A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-century Art Forms. New York, London: Methuen.
JUVAN, Marko 1992: »Z obrobja v središče (pojmovanja parodije na Slovenskem).« Slavistična revija 40/4. 385–408.
JUVAN, Marko 1993: »Parodija kot medbesedilna vrsta.« V: 29. Seminar slovenskega jezika, literature in kulture. Ur. M. Hladnik. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta. 121–143.
JUVAN, Marko 1994: »Interesi parodij, literarni kanon in razvoj.« Slavistična revija 42/1. 81–107.
KRISTEVA, Julia 1969: »Le mot, le dialogue et le roman.« V: ista: Sèméiotikè : Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Pariz: Seuil. 143–173.
LIU, Alan 1990: »Local Transcendence: Cultural Criticism, Postmodemism, and the Romanticism of Detail.« Representations 32. 75–113. Cit. po Shea 1993.
MARKIEWICZ, Henryk 1967: »On the Definitions of Literary Parody.« V: To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday. Vol. 3. Haag, Pariz: Mouton. 1264–1272.
MCCANLES, Michael 1980: »The Authentic Discourse of the Renaissance.« Diacritics 10. 77–87.
MOROZOV, Aleksandr 1930: »Literaturnaja rol’ parodii.« V: Russkaja literaturnaja parodija. Ur. B. Begak, N. Kravcov, A. Morozov. Moskva: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo. 104–114.
MORSON, Gary Saul 1989: »Parody, History, and Metaparody.« V: Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and Challenges. Ur. G. S. Morson, C. Emerson. Evanston: Northwestem University Press. 63–86.
MÜLLER, Beate 1994: Komische Intertextualität: Die literarische Parodie. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
NIETZSCHE, Friedrich 1988: Onstran dobrega in zlega: Predigra k filozofiji prihodnosti. H genealogiji morale: Polemični spis. Prev. J. Moder, T. Bizjak. Ljubljana: Slovenska matica.
PECHEY, Graham 1989: »On the Borders of Bakhtin: Dialogisation, Decolonisation.« V: Bakhtin and Cultural Theory. Ur. K. Hirschkop, D. Shepherd. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 39–67.
PFISTER, Manfred 1991: »How Postmodern is Intertextuality?« V: Intertextuality. Ur. H. F. Plett. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. 207–224.
REID, Alan 1990: Literature as Communication and Cognition in Bakhtin and Lotman. New York, London: Garland.
RITTER, Harry: »Historicism, Historism.« V: Dictionary of Concepts in History. New York: Greenwood. 183–188.
ROSE, Margaret A. 1979: Parody/Meta-fiction. London: Croom Helm.
ROSE, Margaret A. 1988: »Parody/ Post-modernism.« Poetics 17. 49–56.
ROSE, Margaret A. 1993: Parody: Ancient, Modern, and Post-modern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SHEA, Victor 1993: »New Historicism.« V: Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory: Approaches, Scholars, Terms. Ur. I. R. Makaryk. Toronto idr.: University of Toronto Press. 124–130.
SKAZA, Aleksander 1982: »Mihail Mihajlovič Bahtin (oris življenja in dela).« V: Bahtin 1982. 384–424.
STAUDER, Thomas 1993: Die literarische Travestie: Terminologische Systematik und paradigmatische Analyse (Deutschland, England, Frankreich, Italien). New York, Bern, Frankfurt ob Majni: P. Lang.
STRIEDTER, Jurij 1969: »Zur formalistischen Theorie der Prosa und der literarischen Evolution.« V: Texte der russischen Formalisten. Bd. I. Ur. J. Striedter. München: Fink, IX–LXXXIII.
ŠKULJ, Jola 1993: »Poststrukturalizem in Bahtinov pojem dialogizma.« Primerjalna književnost 16/1. 16–27.
THOMSON, Clive 1986: »Problèmes théoriques de la parodie.« V: La parodie : Théorie et lecture. Ur. Groupar. Études littéraires 19/1. 13–19.
THOMSON, Clive 1984: »Parody/Genre/Ideology.« V: Le singe à la porte : Vers une théorie de la parodie. Ur. Groupar. New York, Bern, Frankfurt ob Majni: P. Lang. 95–103.
UHANOV, Galin 1996: »Reification and Dialogue: Theory of the Novel and Social Philosophy in Bakhtin and Lukacs.« V: Bahtin in humanistične vede/Bakhtin and the Humanities. Ur. M. Javornik idr. Ljubljana: Znanstveni inštitut Filozofske fakultete. (V pripravi za tisk.)
VEESER, Aram H. (ur.) 1989: The New Historicism. New York: Routledge.
WHITE, Allon 1984: »Bakhtin, Sociolinguistics and Deconstruction.« V: The Theory of Reading. Ur. F. Gloversmith. Sussex, New Jersey: Harvester Press. 123–146.
WILSON, Robert R. 1986: »Play, Transgression and Carnival: Bakhtin and Derrida on scriptor ludens.« Mosaic 19/1. 75–89.
