Literary Repertoire and Interference Among Literatures

Authors

  • Marijan Dović

Keywords:

national literature, literary canon, literary interferences, Slovene literature, Prešeren, France

Abstract

The article uses concepts of polysystem theory, especially the notion of literary repertoire, to analyze mechanisms which take place when a particular (national) literary system adopts and makes use of elements of other systems’ repertoires and in this way maintains its systemic optimum. An obvious model for these processes can be observed in Slovenian literature with reference to the work of a romantic poet, France Prešeren, who introduced models and repertoires from other literary traditions in a systematic and original fashion. Later, these elements became a constitutive part of – by that time still underdeveloped and weak –the Slovenian literary repertoire.

References

BOURDIEU, Pierre (2000): The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Trans. by Susan Emanuel. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

CATTRYSSE, Patrick (1997): “Polysystem Theory and Cultural Studies.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature(CRCL/RCLC), XXIV/1, pp. 49–55.

ČOP, Matija (1983); Pisma in spisi. Ed. by Janko Kos. Ljubljana, Mladinska knjiga. (Kondor 206.)

DIMIĆ, Milan V. (1993): “Polysystem Theory. In Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory. Approaches, Scholars, Terms. Ed. by Irena R. Makaryk. Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press, pp. 151–155.

DOVIĆ, Marijan (2002). “Radikalni konstruktivizem in sistemska teorija kot teoretična temelja empirične literarne znanosti.” Primerjalna književnost, XXV/2, pp. 59–76.

EVEN-ZOHAR, Itamar (1990): “Polysystem Studies.” Poetics Today, XI/1 (Special Edition).

EVEN-ZOHAR, Itamar (1997): “Factors and Dependencies in Culture: A Revised Outline for Polysystem Culture Research.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature (CRCL/RCLC), XXIV/1, pp. 15–34.

GANTAR, Kajetan (2002): “Antični substrat v metaforiki Prešernovih nemških pesmi.” In: France Prešeren–kultura–Evropa. Ljubljana: Založba ZRC, pp. 125–148.

KOS, Janko (2001): Primerjalna zgodovina slovenske literature. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga.

LAMBERT, José (1997): “Itamar Even-Zohar’s Polysystem Studies: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Culture Research.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature (CRCL/RCLC), XXIV/1, pp. 7–14.

LUHMANN, Niklas (2000): Art as a Social System. Trans. by Eva M. Knodt. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

NOVAK, Boris A. (2002): “Odmevi trubadurskega kulta ljubezni pri Prešernu.” In France Prešeren–kultura–Evropa. Ljubljana: Založba ZRC, pp. 15–48.

PREŠEREN, France (1974): Pesnitve in pisma. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga. (Kondor 25 and 35.)

SCHMIDT, Siegfried J. (1980): Grundriss der Empirischen Literaturwissenschaft. Vol. 1 and 2. Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg.

SCHMIDT, Siegfried J. (1989): Die Selbstorganisation des Sozialsystems Literatur im 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

SHEFFY, Rakefet (1997): “Models and Habituses: Problems in the Idea of Cultural Repertoires.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature (CRCL/RCLC), XXIV/1, pp. 35–47.

SNOJ, Vid (2002): “Ženska sonce – Razris figure iz Petrarcovega in Prešernovega pesništva.” In France Prešeren–kultura–Evropa. Ljubljana: Založba ZRC, pp. 61–74.

TOURY, Gideon (1995): Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-15