Narrative and Event. Reflection on Literary Historiography

Authors

  • Vid Snoj

Keywords:

literary history, historiography, literature, narrative, fiction, event, essentialism, relationism, Longinus, sublime, das Unheimliche

Abstract

This article begins by drawing attention to the traditional differentiation between history (res gestae) and historiography (historia rerum gestarum). In the nineteenth century, the difference between these was concealed in Ranke’s programmatic formula claiming that historians must report wie es eigentlich gewesen. In this formulation, the story of history is equated with the historian’s narrative, which becomes its transparent medium. In contrast, modern and postmodern metahistoriographic criticism clearly differentiates between them, claiming at the same time that the “story” of history is nothing but a narrative fiction because emplotment is already the work of the historian’s narrative. However, this article shows that narrative or the narrated story (i.e., the work of the narrative ability as an unabolishable human feature) always exists before both historical and literary narrative, which are merely its explication. On the other hand, the event (i.e., the smallest “unit” of history) is not merely a fictitious product of narrative or something that has always existed within a language, as the postmodern hermeneutics of suspicion suggests. The paradox becomes even stronger with the literary event: although this depends on the letter, it does not constitute anything linguistic by itself. The best testimony of this is provided by Longinus’ description of the soul’s elevation through a sublime wording, which is used in the article as a model for the description of the literary event. This event (i.e., the meeting of writing and reading which occurs at the wording) is ahistorical by itself because it takes place in the timelessness of the soul’s ecstatic elevation, as well as transhistorical because it comes to pass at all times. The literary-historical narrative must proceed from it as the basic tone regardless which thematic key it is written in – that is, even when it focuses not only on one literary work, but takes shape as a story of a literary period, movement, genre, and so on.

References

Aristoteles. De arte poetica liber. Ur. Rudolf Kassel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965.

– – –. Poetika. Prev. Kajetan Gantar, Ljubljana: Cankarjeva založba, 1982.

Averincev, Sergei S. Atene e Gerusalemme. Contrapposizione e incontro di due principi creativi. Rim: Donzelli Editore, 1994.

Attridge, Derek. The Singularity of Literature. London in New York: Routledge, 2004.

Avrelij Avguštin. Izpovedi. Prevod Antona Sovreta priredil Kajetan Gantar. Celje: Mohorjeva družba, 1978.

Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Ur. Adam Phillips. Oxford in New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.

Culler, Jonathan. »La littérarité.« Théorie littéraire. Problèmes et perspectives. Ur. Marc Angenot, Jean Bessière, Douwe Fokkema in Eva Kushner. Pariz: PUF, 1989. 31–43.

Fränkel, Hermann. »Die Zeitauffassung in der frühgriechischen Literatur.« Wege und Formen frühgriechischen Denkens. Literarische und philosophiegeschichtliche Studien. Ur. Franz Tietze. München: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1955. 1–22.

Freud, Sigmund. »Das UnheimlicheDas Unheimliche. Ur. Mladen Dolar. Prev. Doris Debenjak. Ljubljana: Društvo za teoretsko psihoanalizo, 1994. 3–36.

Hamilton, Paul. Historicism. London in New York: Routledge, 1996.

Hollier, Denis (ur.). A New History of French Literature. Cambridge, Massachusetts, in London: Harvard University Press, 1989.

Jakobson, Roman. Novejšaja russkaja poezija. Nabrosok pervij. Viktor Hlebnikov. Praga: Tipografija »Politika«, 1921.

– – –. »Najnovija ruska poezija.« Ogledi iz poetike. Ur. Milan Komnenić in Leon Kojen. Beograd: Nolit, 1978. 49–57.

Juvan, Marko. »O literaturi zgodovinsko: veliki žanr med zgodbo in hipertekstom.« Literarna veda v rekonstrukciji. Ljubljana: LUD Literatura, 2006. 55–90.

Kocijančič, Gorazd. »O biti preteklega.« Razbitje. Sedem radikalnih esejev. Ljubljana: Študentska založba, 2009. 79–110.

Longinus. On the Sublime. Gr.-ang. izd. Ur. D. A. Russell. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. »Über Wahrheit und Lüge im aussermoralischen Sinne.« Kritische Studienausgabe 1. Ur. Giorgio Colli in Mazzino Montinari. 2. izd. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Berlin in New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1988. 873–890.

Platon. »Simpozij.« Zbrana dela. 1. zv. Prev. Gorazd Kocijančič. Celje: Mohorjeva družba, 2004. 492–528.

von Ranke, Leopold. »Preface to the History of the Latin and Teutonic Nations.« The Varieties of History. From Voltaire to the Present. Ur. Fritz Richard Stern. 2. izd. London: Macmillan, 1970. 55–62.

Ricoeur, Paul. Le conflit des interprétations. Essais d’herméneutique. Pariz: Éditions du Seuil, 1969. 142–151.

– – –. Temps et récit. 1. zv.: L’intrigue et le récit historique. Pariz: Éditions du Seuil, 1983.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. Qu’est-ce que la littérature? Pariz: Gallimard, 1948.

Steiner, George. Real Presences. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.

Szegedy-Maszák, Mihály. »Keywords in Literary History.« Neohelicon 30.2 (2003): 15–23.

Virk, Tomo. Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja. Kritični pregled. Ljubljana: Založba ZRC, ZRC SAZU, 2007.

White, Hayden. Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore in London: The John Hopkins University Press, 1987.

Woolf, Virginia. The Diary. 2. zv.: 1920–1924. Ur. Anne Olivier Bell in Andrew McNeillie. London: Hogarth Press, 1978.

Published

2017-10-09

Issue

Section

Articles